Carman v. . Plass
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
This case comes precisely within the language of section 120 of the Code of Procedure, which provides that "persons severally liable upon the same obligation or instrument, including the parties to bills of exchange and promissory notes, may all, or any of them, be included in the same action, at the option of the plaintiff." I see no reason to doubt that it is likewise within the meaning and intention of the enactment. It relates expressly to several, and not to joint liabilities. The latter did not require the aid of a special provision; for a plurality of joint contractors always could be,…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Lang v. . LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Wibaux v. Grinnell Live Stock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1889
- Cridler v. CurryNew York Supreme Court · 1873
- Roehr v. LiebmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Harris v. EldridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1879
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.