Legal Opinion

Terry v. Cutler

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 17, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Grayson. Tried below before M. H. Garrett, Esq., Special Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Associate Justice.

Conclusions of Fact.—There is no statement of facts contained in the record, and the conclusions of the court below are adopted as the conclusions of this court (except the fifteenth and twentieth, as follows:

“1. Under an agreement made in open court, the land in controversy is worth, not including the improvements, §3600. The improve-* ments in the aggregate are worth §2900, to-wit: W. T. Cutler, §1000; A. H. Shirley, §600; Shirley Platt, §600; Dave Platt, §300; Reinhardt Klumm, §150, and defendant Williams, §250. Under said agreement it was not necessary for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stiles v. JaphetTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Flanagan v. OberthierTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Terry v. CutlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowman v. OakleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Bibby v. BibbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Wall v. LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Kenedy Pasture Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Campsey v. Jack County Oil & Gas AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API