Clark v. Locke
New York Supreme Court
Submission on agreed statement. Action by Martin Clark against William H. Locke. The cause was submitted without action on an agreed statement of facts, as provided by Code Civil Proc. BT. Y. § 1279.
1Opinion of the CourtMacomber, J.
In the year 1873, one Balcom was the owner of real estate, situated in the city of Buffalo, upon which there was then due and unpaid to the city for taxes, including interest and additions, the sum of $10,849. A month before this time the common council of that city had agreed to receive a mortgage upon the lands of Balcom in the sum of $10,849, and such mortgage, accompanying the bond of Balcom, was accordingly executed and delivered to the city on the 29th day of January, 1873. Afterwards, and on the 29th day of April, 1883, the comptroller of the city sold these lands for nonpayment of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- French v. . CarhartNew York Court of Appeals · 1847
- The Rider Life Raft Co. v. . RoachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Mayor, Etc., of New York v. . SonnebornNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- The Mayor, C., of New-York v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co v. RoachNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pickell v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Wells v. JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- People ex rel. Atkins v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- People ex rel. Atkins v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- Wells v. JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.