Estate of Frant v. Haystack Group, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
Martin Erant sued for injuries received when he skied into a wooden lift-corral post at defendant Haystack’s ski area.* Haystack won summary judgment under Vermont’s sports injury statute, which states that “a person who takes part in any sport accepts as a matter of law the dangers that inhere therein insofar as *13they are obvious and necessary.” 12 V.S.A. § 1037 (acceptance of inherent risks). We hold the trial court misconstrued § 1037 by concluding that, regardless of whether the ski area’s use of the wooden posts was negligent, the statute prevented recovery as a matter of law because…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Sunday v. Stratton Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- Wright v. Mt. Mansfield Lift, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1951
- In Re R.S. Audley, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- David J. Dillworth Dorothy Dillworth v. Andrew GambardellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dalury v. S-K-I, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Gemmink v. Jay Peak Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Halpern v. WheeldonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Nutbrown v. Mount Cranmore, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Candido v. Polymers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.