Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Meyer
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided June 5, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtAdlerman, J.
This action is brought to recover the sum of $1,370.18, owed to the plaintiff, an employee of Sigman & Cohen, Inc. Malia Meyer, the defendant, is alleged to be a stockholder of Sigman & Cohen, Inc., and this action is brought to enforce the liability of the defendant under sections 71 and 73 of the Stock Corporation Law. The evidence discloses that on or about June 10, 1931, Malia Meyer, the defendant, was about to enter a hospital for an operation, and before entering the hospital she transferred, on June 10, 1931, all the stock she held in her name to her son, Nathan P. Meyer, and that on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Elections of Directors of George Ringler & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Bean v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- In re WyllyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fuller v. DilbertDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965