Legal Opinion

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Allen E. Kroblin, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided June 30, 1953No. Civ. A. 615PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVEN, District Judge.

The issue in this case is whether or not the interstate transportation by truck of New York dressed and eviscerated poultry is within the scope of the so-called “agricultural” exemption of the Interstate Commerce Act. Section 303(b) (6) of 49 U.S.C.A.; Section 303(b) (6) of Title 49 of the United States Code. In the United States Statutes at Large, Chapter 498, 49 Statutes 543, 544, that Section appears as Section 203(b) (6). In the legislative history that Section is referred to as Section 203 (b) (6). For that reason it will be referred to herein by that number.

In…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Parrish v. SollecitoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. Manhat v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. Foster v. FlemmingDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
  4. Frozen Food Express v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1955
  5. Milk Transport, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API