Legal Opinion

Auto West, Inc. v. Baggs

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1984No. 17984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

This is an appeal by Auto West, Inc., Charles Bryan, Paul Graff, and Norman P. Stephens (appellants) from a judgment awarding them $6,334.12 in damages, and an appeal by Charles Bryan from a judgment awarding Richard Baggs $25,000 damages for slander. The trial court also ruled that certain stock proxies executed by Graff and Bryan in favor of Baggs were irrevocable and valid. On this appeal, Auto West, Bryan, Graff and Stephens contend (1) that the money judgment in their favor was insufficient; (2) that the circuit judge who tried the case was without authority to conduct…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barlow v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Prince v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Nichols v. Daily Reporter Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
  4. In re the E. N. Chilson for a Summary Order for Election of Directors of Public Industrials Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  5. Schultz v. SchultzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Furgason v. ClausenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Business Aviation of South Dakota, Inc. v. Medivest, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Russin v. WessonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. In Re Uno Broadcasting Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API