Legal Opinion · Dissent

Juneau County v. Courthouse Employees, Local 1312

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 15, 1998No. 96-2816Published

1DissentDykman, P.J.

I differ with the majority because I conclude that the extrinsic aids relied upon by the trial court to determine the meaning of § 111.70(4)(cm)6., Stats., lead to only one conclusion: The legislature did not intend 1993 Wis. Act 16 to extend Qualified Economic Offer (QEO) procedure to municipal employees. The posture of this case is unusual, however, because Juneau County has not appealed the trial court's conclusion that it must continue to use the arbitration procedures of the statute. There is no longer any question about that conclusion. The only question is whether the meaning of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ball v. District No. 4, Area Board of Vocational, Technical & Adult EducationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  3. State v. BrunetteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API