Legal Opinion

Claim of Peake v. Lakin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an award of the State Industrial Commission, made on the 31st day of May, 1916. Award" affirmed. All concurred, except Lyon, J., who dissented in memorandum, in which Cochrane, J., concurred.

1Opinion of the Court

Lyon, J. (dissenting):

I do not think the evidence and the findings of the Commission warrant treating Peake as an employee of Lakin. The contract was let by Lakin to Mallory to cut, peel and deliver the bark on the cars for five dollars per ton. Mallory made an arrangement with Peake and another to assist him in the work. Had Lakin paid Mallory the contract price upon the completion of the job, and Mallory have neglected to pay Peake, the latter could not have recovered pay for his services from Lakin. The mere fact that Mallory was expected to take on whatever assistants he might need, would…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. GreensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API