Legal Opinion

State v. Mintner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1982No. 12678PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Following jury trial defendant was convicted of possession of burglar’s tools, § 569.180, RSMo 1978, and sentenced to one year in the county jail. He contends (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction because there was no direct evidence that he was in possession of a burglar’s tool and the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to show possession, and (2) that the submission instruction omitted a necessary finding.

To convict for possession of burglar’s tools, the state must show that the defendant had possession in the legal sense, but need not prove…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BuffingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Slade v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. SaffoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. ShoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. EmeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. MillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API