Legal Opinion

State v. Marohl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2010No. 83570-5PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

¶1 The State charged James Michael Marohl with second degree assault or, in the alternative, third degree assault after he placed Joseph Rex Peterson in a choke hold and caused Peterson to fall to the floor. Peterson’s impact with the ground scraped and bruised his face, and his prosthetic arm broke off above the elbow. A jury found Marohl not guilty of second degree assault but guilty of third degree assault under RCW 9A.36.031(l)(d). Marohl appealed his conviction, claiming insufficient evidence existed to show he committed third degree assault because the floor was not an “instrument or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ShepardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State Of Washington v. Jose Antonio Garfias-lopezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. State Of Washington v. Stephen TimmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington, V Trevor S. AltmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API