Bankers Trust Co. of California v. Baca
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} The district court sua sponte dismissed Plaintiffs foreclosure action without prejudice under Rule 1-041(E)(2) NMRA for failure to take any significant action against Defendants within the previous 180 days. After its motion for reinstatement under Rule 1-041(E)(2) was denied for failure to show good cause, Plaintiff filed a new foreclosure action. In ruling in Defendants’ favor on their motion to dismiss Plaintiffs second action, the district court found that Plaintiffs complaint in the second action was “a refilling [sic] of the same case and cause of action, with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- King v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Smith v. WalcottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Vigil v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Wershaw v. DimasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cagan v. Village of Angel FireNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. BeauvaisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Associated Home & RV Sales, Inc. v. Bank of BelenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Rodriguez v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- Foster v. Sun Healthcare Group, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- N.M. Uninsured Employers' Fund v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.