Legal Opinion

Bankers Trust Co. of California v. Baca

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 2006No. 26,010PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

{1} The district court sua sponte dismissed Plaintiffs foreclosure action without prejudice under Rule 1-041(E)(2) NMRA for failure to take any significant action against Defendants within the previous 180 days. After its motion for reinstatement under Rule 1-041(E)(2) was denied for failure to show good cause, Plaintiff filed a new foreclosure action. In ruling in Defendants’ favor on their motion to dismiss Plaintiffs second action, the district court found that Plaintiffs complaint in the second action was “a refilling [sic] of the same case and cause of action, with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. King v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Smith v. WalcottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Vigil v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Wershaw v. DimasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Cagan v. Village of Angel FireNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. BeauvaisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Associated Home & RV Sales, Inc. v. Bank of BelenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Rodriguez v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Foster v. Sun Healthcare Group, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. N.M. Uninsured Employers' Fund v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API