Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 23, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2009-1364PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs [50] Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s [47] Order, granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and accompanying [48] Memorandum Opinion. Plaintiff argues that: (1) the Court erred by not considering the record from the instant matter and two subsequent cases filed by Plaintiff as a whole in reaching its holding; (2) the Court erred by failing to consider • medical evidence presented by Plaintiff; and (3) the Court erred by applying case law related to Title VII claims…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Conservation Force v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. WestCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018