Legal Opinion

Rhatigan v. Power

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 4, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Schmidt, J., dissent and vote to reverse, with the following memorandum: Concededly appellant was at the time of his registration and enrollment in 1952 a qualified voter in the district in which he was registered. Consequently, although he may have given erroneous information in connection with his registration, his name was not unlawfully entered on the register and should not have been stricken therefrom pursuant to section 331 of the Election Law. Neither should his enrollment have been…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roosevelt v. PowerNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API