Rhatigan v. Power
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Schmidt, J., dissent and vote to reverse, with the following memorandum: Concededly appellant was at the time of his registration and enrollment in 1952 a qualified voter in the district in which he was registered. Consequently, although he may have given erroneous information in connection with his registration, his name was not unlawfully entered on the register and should not have been stricken therefrom pursuant to section 331 of the Election Law. Neither should his enrollment have been…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Roosevelt v. PowerNew York Supreme Court · 1960