Legal Opinion

Patient's Compensation Fund Oversight Board v. Succession of Hedgepeth

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1999No. 98 CA 1695Published

1Opinion of the Court

J^FOGG, J.

The issue raised on appeal in this medical malpractice case is whether or not the Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Board (the PCF Board) and the Patient’s Compensation Fund (the Fund) are liable for interest paid on part of an adverse judgment which exceeded $100,000.00, when that sum was paid by the physician’s medical malpractice insurer pursuant to its contract with the physician. The trial court held that the PCF Board and the Fund are required to pay that interest. For the following reasons, we affirm.

The facts are undisputed. On October 2, 1985, Julia Hedgepeth consulted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seagers v. PailetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API