Legal Opinion
In re Lorusso
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 2011No. 2011 CA 0666PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
12Nicholas Lorusso appeals the declaratory decision of the Board of Ethics, functioning as the Supervisory Committee on Campaign Finance Disclosure (the Board), wherein it declared that he was not permitted to amend the report he timely submitted to the Board as required by the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act1 to reflect that a $30,000.00 payment by him to his campaign for election to the state house of representatives was a loan rather than a contribution. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and render.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Rep. Lorusso was the successful candidate for the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Church Point Wholesale Beverage Co., Inc. v. TarverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- American Waste v. St. Martin ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Duplantis v. Louisiana Bd. of EthicsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Prator v. Caddo ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Steiner v. ReedLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re ToneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re JelksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- In re ToneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Jerome Morgan, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Blair's Bail Bonds, Inc., Bankers Insurance Company, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025