Legal Opinion

Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Beshears

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 7, 1993No. 69,322, 69,323, 69,442PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

This is a consolidated appeal. ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) and Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG) (collectively referred to as appellants or pipelines) appeal the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA) and the district court. Both BOTA and the district court have dismissed appellants’ claim because of a lack of jurisdiction. The pipelines argue the denial of a review of their claims is a denial of their due process rights.

In order to properly understand the jurisdictional issues presented in this case, a brief overview of the appellants’ underlying claim is necessary.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Koerpel v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. Symns v. GravesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Felten Truck Line, Inc. v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Zarda v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. ANR Pipeline Co. v. LafaverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. BeshearsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Sage v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  4. In Re Application of KinnetCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
  5. St. Catherine Hospital v. RoopCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API