Legal Opinion

Carl Manora v. Patrick R. Donahoe

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 29, 2011No. 10-10773UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-appellant Carl Manora, an African-American, lost his position as an audit manager for the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) in a competitive reselection process. Manora claims that he was not reselected for the position because of race and sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The district court granted USPS’s 1 motion for summary judgment, finding that USPS articulated legitimate reasons for not reselecting Manora, and that Manora failed to present sufficient evidence that those reasons…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Laxton v. Gap Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Golatt v. Perot Museum of Nature and ScienceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
  2. Villa v. Texas Parks and Wildlife DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API