Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 24, 2016No. 2015-KH-2328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

| ¶ Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. We attach hereto and make a part hereof the District Court’s written reasons denying relator’s application.

Relator has now fully litigated at least eight applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. Adams v. ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. State v. WrightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. State v. NelsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. State ex rel. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API