LaValley v. Ravenna
Supreme Court of Vermont
General Assumpsit for goods conditionally sold and delivered. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the March Term, 1904, Rutland County, Tyler, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted.
Read the full summary
General Assumpsit for goods conditionally sold and delivered. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the March Term, 1904, Rutland County, Tyler, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that he sold defendant a buggy, robe, harness and whip, and received therefor a horse, harness and wagon, and forty dollars, and the written contract mentioned in the opinion to secure the further sum of seventy-five dollars. At the close Of the evidence the defendant moved for a verdict upon the following grounds: “First. The…
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
This is an action of general assumpsit for the recovery of a balance due on the purchase of certain per-, sonal property. The parties disagreed somewhat in regard to the precise terms of the contract, but it satisfactorily appears from the record that the plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendant a team consisting of a horse, buggy and harness, receiving in part payment therefor another horse, harness and wagon, and a certain sum of money, and taking as security for the unpaid balance of the price agreed upon a written lien on all the property so conveyed to the defendant. Soon after, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tufts v. Wynne & ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- Appleton v. Norwalk Library Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Smith v. AldrichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- French v. OsmerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1895
- American Soda Fountain Co. v. VaughnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kabase v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
- State v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Holt Manufacturing Co. v. JaussaudWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Exposition Arcade Corp. v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1912
- O'neill-Adams Co. v. EklundSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.