Legal Opinion

In Re Wiedemann

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 24, 2009No. 2009-B-0674Published

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent attempted to practice law in Mississippi, contrary to the regulations of that jurisdiction. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Karl Wiedemann, Louisiana Bar Roll number 18502, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall enroll in and attend one full day…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re EngolioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API