Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. LeMoyne

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. W. L. Pond, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hand

This was an application in the county court of Cook county for the confirmation of a special assessment levied to pay for paving and curbing Thirty-eighth street, in the city of Chicago, from a line parallel with and 475.3 feet east of the east , line of Butler street to the east line of South Morgan street. The appellees appeared and filed objections to the confirmation of said assessment as to their property, which objections were sustained and the proceedings were dismissed, and the city has prosecuted this appeal.

The ordinance provides for the placing of 6784 feet of curbing along the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Springfield v. MathusIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Rockford v. SchultzIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. City of East St. Louis v. VogelIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Village of Ladd v. Chicago, Ottawa & Peoria Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. City of Chicago v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. City of Watseka v. OrebaughIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API