Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Coshatt

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1991No. 1901158PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in a boundary line dispute between coterminous landowners. We affirm.

Lawrence Dean Johnson sued Emmett M. Coshatt and Carol J. Coshatt, alleging ownership, by adverse possession, of a strip of land approximately five feet in width that adjoins and runs along the northeastern boundary of Johnson's property ("the disputed strip"). The disputed strip is an untravelled part of an easement 25 feet in width that was purchased by the Coshatts to provide a means of ingress to and egress from their landlocked property. The disputed strip gradually slopes…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fitts v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Lay v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  3. McNeil v. HaddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Bull v. SalsmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. West v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arturo Villarreal v. Nita MossCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2025
  2. Jones v. Adams FarmsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  3. Zoghby v. StantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Zoghby v. StantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API