Legal Opinion
Sierra Club v. Robertson
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided April 25, 1991No. Civ. 90-2150PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this case contend that the 1986 Land and Resource Management Plan for the Ouachita National Forest (“1986 LRMP”) and the Plan as amended in March of 1990 (“Amended LRMP” or “1990 LRMP”) violate the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4332, the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), 16 U.S.C. § 1600 et seq., and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. They also challenge the adequacy of the Final Environmental Impact Statements (“FEIS”) prepared in conjunction…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Salmon River Concerned Citizens v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Sierra Club v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Salmon River Concerned Citizens v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Wilderness Society v. AlcockDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
- Sierra Club v. EspyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.