McLaughlin v. Heid
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the late District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, county of San Joaquin, and from an order refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
2Per curiam
This was an action of ejectment in which judgment was rendered for plaintiff. This appeal is prosecuted by defendant.
The plaintiff claimed under a patent of the United States purporting on its face to have been issued under a grant of land made to the Central Pacific Railroad Company, and the Western Pacific Railroad Company, by acts of Congress passed in the years 1862 and 1864. This patent was offered in evidence, together with other evidence, and to both patent and the evidence referred to, various objections were made by defendant.…
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. City of San Pedro Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. McCuskerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- United Land Ass'n v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Carr v. QuigleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.