Legal Opinion

Castaneda v. Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided November 14, 2022No. 6:22-cv-01141Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION LEESA CASTANEDA, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:22-cv-1141-CEM-EJK LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., and VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG, Defendants. ORDER This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Alternative Service on Defendant, Vifor (International) AG (the “Motion”) (Docs. 18, 19, 20), filed October 5, 2022. Defendant Vifor (International) AG (“Vifor”) responded in opposition on October 18, 2022. (Doc. 21.) Upon consideration, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Prewitt Enterprises, Inc. v. Organization of Petroleum Exporting CountriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. McClenon v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1989
  4. Vega Glen v. Club Méditerranée S.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API