Legal Opinion

Michael N. Sheridan Mary A. Sheridan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1992No. 91-1865PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLYDE H. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs in the district court, Michael and Mary Sheridan, husband and wife, appeal the order of the district court granting summary judgment to the defendant, the United States, on the Sheridans’ claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671, and denying their motion for summary judgment on the same claim. Plaintiffs allege that the negligence of the defendant resulted in a drunken, off-duty serviceman shooting at and injuring plaintiffs with a gun which the serviceman stored in his base quarters in violation of Navy…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sheridan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Thigpen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. Scott v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Henley v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mrs. Verdie Mae Franklin Verdie Mae Franklin, Administratrix of the Estate of Lonnie B. Franklin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Leleux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. E.G. Rock, Inc. v. DanlyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Lumsden Ex Rel. Estate of Lumsden v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
  5. Matteo v. LivingstoneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API