Adams v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

We have again reviewed the case in the light of the able motion for rehearing. Appellant insists that Forbes was an accomplice witness as a matter of law. We still find ourselves unable to assent to this proposition. Appellant cites Franklin v. State, 227 S. W. Rep. 486; Franklin v. State, 230 S. W. Rep. 692; Chandler v. State, 232 S. W. Rep. 337, and Dean v. State, 272 S. W. Rep. 1113. Each of these cases was tried under the law as it was before the passage of present Art. 670 P. C, which takes the transporter, possessor and purchaser of intoxicating…