Legal Opinion

Willoughby v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 23, 1986No. 85-2645Published

1Per curiam

This appeal follows the defendant’s sentencing, the trial court having denied his motion to suppress. We find no error in the trial court’s decision, which we affirm. Shapiro v. State, 390 So.2d 344 (Fla.1980). We conclude that the defendant is without standing to raise the constitutional issue that the state attorney’s unreasonable application of Section 893.135(3), Florida Statutes (1985), denied him equal protection. He admitted that he did not have the ability to provide substantial assistance. See Sandstrom v. Leader, 370 So.2d 3, 4 (Fla.1979). See also State v. Stella, 454 So.2d 780…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Sandstrom v. LeaderSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. State v. StellaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API