Legal Opinion

Swassing v. Baum

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1976No. 40215, 40216PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

This case involves appeals from the sustaining of demurrers and the dismissal by the District Court of the plaintiffs’ petitions. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

On August 6, 1974, petitions were filed by the plaintiffs in the District Court for Douglas County, Nebraska. The defendant, Dr. Baum, and his employee, Mrs. Van De Vegt, were named as codefendants. The petitions alleged the following facts. In June or July 1966, plaintiff Lynn Swassing came to Dr. Baum for testing and examination to determine if she was pregnant. Dr. Baum ordered Mrs. Van De Vegt to do a blood typing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Stacey v. PantanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hirst v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Witherspoon v. Sides Const. Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Rosnick v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Colton v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Reinke Manufacturing Co. v. HayesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API