Legal Opinion

Raghunathan Sarma & Gaile Sarma v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided December 12, 2018No. 26318-16Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

T.C. Memo. 2018-201

UNITED STATES TAX COURT RAGHUNATHAN SARMA AND GAILE SARMA, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 26318-16. Filed December 12, 2018. Charles E. Hodges II, Antoinette G. Ellison, and Aditya Shrivastava, for petitioners. Leslie J. Spiegel and Craig Connell, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION GOEKE, Judge: This case is before us on the parties’ cross-motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction following respondent’s issuance of an affected item -2- [*2] notice of deficiency. The parties submitted a declaration of witnesses with attached exhibits.1…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  3. United States v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Bond v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  5. FPL Group, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API