Legal Opinion

State v. John

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1904PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Muscatine District Court.— Hon. James W. Bollinger, Judge. The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of the crime of perjury.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

i. indictment: . sufficiency. The indictment is criticised as being defective, in that the precise date of the offense is not stated. No doubt, there is some confusion .in the decisions with respeet to the degree of definiteness required in ¿harging perjury. But section. 5285 of the Code provides that “ the precise time at which the offense was committed need not be stated in the indictment, but it is sufficient, if it allege that it was committed at any time prior to the time of finding thereof, except where time is a material ingredient of the offense.” Section 5289' declares that “ the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CroffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Knowlton v. Des Moines Edison Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  4. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  5. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SandersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. State v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. State v. PowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. State v. GiudiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API