Brown v. . Conner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Rowan County, at the Fall Term 1847, his Honor Judge Pearson, presiding. This was an appeal from the County to the Superior Court of Rowan. In the County Court a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, against both the defendants, who appealed to the Superior Court, and filed an appeal bond, signed by each of them and their sureties.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Rowan County, at the Fall Term 1847, his Honor Judge Pearson, presiding. This was an appeal from the County to the Superior Court of Rowan. In the County Court a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, against both the defendants, who appealed to the Superior Court, and filed an appeal bond, signed by each of them and their sureties. The plaintiff read in evidence a promissory note, signed Conner and Long, which was admitted to have been signed by R. W. Long, one of the defendants. The plaintiff also proved that Conner and Long, as partners,…
1Opinion of the CourtNaso, J.
The judgment below is erroneous and must be reversed. The action was in the County Court of Rowan, upon a promissory note, purportingjto be executed by both the defendants. A verdict was rendered against both, and both appealed to the Superior Court, and united in the appeal bond. On the trial in that Court, the jury found a verdict for the defendant Conner, and against Long, subject to the opinion of the Court upon a question of law reserved. The plaintiff moved for judgment against Long upon the verdict, and against Conner and the surety, for the prosecution of the appeal, upon the appeal…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Kelly v. . MuseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1850
- Frank Bird Transfer Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
- Kelly v. . MuseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1850