Daniel Jeanty v. State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. Daniel Jeanty, a native and citizen of Haiti, appeals the dismissal of his second motion for post-conviction relief (PCR). He argues his counsel was ineffective for not informing him he faced deportation if he pled guilty. After review, we find Jeanty’s PCR motion is both untimely and successive to an earlier PCR motion. So it fails on procedural grounds. We also find the motion has no substantive merit because the current law that attorneys must advise clients of the potential risk of deportation resulting from a guilty plea did not exist when Jeanty entered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
- Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clayton Paul Bateman v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
- Joseph Cook v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2020