Acadia Insurance Company v. Hinds County School Di
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEdith Brown Clement, Circuit Judge
I agree with the majority that the Ace American Policy covers only employment-related claims and join in Parts I — III and V of the opinion. Because the Cowards’ Amended Complaint does not allege an “occurrence” triggering a duty to defend under the Acadia Policy, I dissent from the majority’s holding in Part IV that Acadia owes such a duty to HCSD.
I
As the majority opinion correctly states, an occurrence is triggered only by accidental conduct. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Omnibank, 812 So.2d 196, 201 (Miss.2002). The majority finds the requisite allegation of accidental conduct in the Amended…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- USF&G CO. v. OmnibankMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. ScruggsMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Logisticare Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford v. LipscombMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
- Evanston Insurance v. Neshoba County Fair Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.