Legal Opinion
Anderson Properties, Inc. v. Sawhill Tubular Division, Cyclops Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 14, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court erred in denying defendant SawhilTs motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action alleging intentional interference with contract. In support of its motion, defendant demonstrated that, at the time it hired codefendant Lee, it had no knowledge of the existence of Lee’s noncompetition agreement with plaintiff. Thus, Sawhill demonstrated that plaintiff cannot show the essential elements of its claim that Sawhill intentionally interfered with the contract with knowledge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Israel v. Wood Dolson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Burba v. Rochester Gas & Electric CorpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Martin v. County of MadisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baron v. Pfizer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- New York State Department of Taxation v. BramhallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Curtis v. Town of GalwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Sober v. KalinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Amica Mutual Insurance v. Hart Alarm Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.