Legal Opinion
Claim of Katsaris v. Lockheed Martin Federal Systems
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarpinello, J.
Appeal from an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 20, 2000, which rescinded the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge and restored the case to the trial calendar for further development of the record.
Claimant sustained a work-related injury in July 1996 and returned to a light-duty assignment with a 20-pound lifting restriction imposed by his treating physician. In October 1996, claimant lost his employment for misconduct unrelated to his disability. Concluding that claimant would still be working in his former job if he had not lost that job for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dudlo v. PlasticsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- McDowell v. La VoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Claim of Peng Kim v. Community Living Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Claim of Holman v. Hyde Park Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Byrne v. Fall Fitting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of O'Shea v. Initial Cleaning ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Furrer v. Suffolk County Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Katsaris v. Lockheed Martin Federal SystemsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Cicinnati v. Clare Rose, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010