Legal Opinion

Findley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1954No. 2 Div. 869Published

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Judge.

By a Solicitor’s complaint this appellant was charged with doing business as a transient photographer without having procured a license as required by Section 569, Title 51, Code of Alabama 1940.

Section 569, supra, imposes a license upon transient photographers in the following terms:

“Every photograph gallery, or person engaged in photography, when the business is conducted at a fixed location : In cities and towns of seventy-five thousand inhabitants and over, twenty-five dollars; in cities and towns of less than seventy-five thousand and not less than forty thousand…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. City of AttallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. American Bakeries Co. v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Alabama CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. City of DecaturAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Graves v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API