Legal Opinion
Findley v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided April 14, 1954No. 2 Div. 869Published
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
By a Solicitor’s complaint this appellant was charged with doing business as a transient photographer without having procured a license as required by Section 569, Title 51, Code of Alabama 1940.
Section 569, supra, imposes a license upon transient photographers in the following terms:
“Every photograph gallery, or person engaged in photography, when the business is conducted at a fixed location : In cities and towns of seventy-five thousand inhabitants and over, twenty-five dollars; in cities and towns of less than seventy-five thousand and not less than forty thousand…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. City of AttallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- American Bakeries Co. v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Alabama CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. City of DecaturAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Graves v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.