Mather v. Mather, (No. 1)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
There are a number of unusual features involved in the divorce proceeding in which we are now required to reach and state our independent judgment upon its merits. The libellant, thirty-eight and the respondent thirty-six years of age, respectively, are persons of education and refinement. Libellant is a lawyer of excellent standing in his profession; respondent taught school several years under a certificate from Drexel Institute. Both expressed themselves clearly, neither displayed any hostility toward the other, but their testimony upon the vital points of the case…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MacDonald v. MacDonaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Laterza v. LaterzaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
3Cited by3 opinions
- Willis v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Barnes v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Mather v. Mather, (No. 2)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940