Legal Opinion

Mather v. Mather, (No. 1)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1940No. 1; Appeal, 163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

There are a number of unusual features involved in the divorce proceeding in which we are now required to reach and state our independent judgment upon its merits. The libellant, thirty-eight and the respondent thirty-six years of age, respectively, are persons of education and refinement. Libellant is a lawyer of excellent standing in his profession; respondent taught school several years under a certificate from Drexel Institute. Both expressed themselves clearly, neither displayed any hostility toward the other, but their testimony upon the vital points of the case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. MacDonaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Laterza v. LaterzaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willis v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Barnes v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Mather v. Mather, (No. 2)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API