Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mobil-Teria Catering Co. v. Spradling

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 1978No. 60323Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSeiler, Judge

I must respectfully disagree with the conclusion expressed in the majority opinion that Kansas City cannot validly tax taxpayer’s receipts directly derived from sales made outside Kansas City.1

The majority concludes that “place of business” refers to the location of the trucks in order to avoid the constitutional question whether the tax would be valid if “place of business” were construed to mean Kansas City. For the reasons discussed below, I believe “place of business” refers to the appellant’s location in Kansas City and that the statute is valid under this interpretation.

Sections 92.400-…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Louis v. Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  3. City of Dallas v. Texas Prudential Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Fabick and Company v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. Kansas City v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API