Legal Opinion

Weidemeyer v. Woodrum

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Boone Circuit Court. — How. D. 11. Harris, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

Action to recover commission as a real estate broker. The jury found for defendant. Plaintiff claims the admitted facts show he should recover the amount sued for; that the jury was erroneously instructed; wherefore he asks a reversal with directions to enter judgment in his favor. Defendant contends that plaintiff must fail without regard to whether error was committed. This assertion, if well founded, disposes of the case. Hence it should be considered first. It is, based upon two grounds: First, that plaintiff abandoned his efforts to effect a sale; second, that his efforts did not result…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tyler v. ParrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Cunliff v. HausmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Veatch v. NormanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Jones, Edwards & Co. v. GrossmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vining v. Mo-La Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  2. Foley v. HasseyWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Nooning v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Cranke v. Trinity Gravel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API