Legal Opinion

State v. Pinkston

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 9, 2020No. 1701018345Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE ) V. I.D.: 1701018345 MATEO PINKSTON, Defendant. Submitted: September 9, 2020 Decided: October 9, 2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief. DENIED Motion to Withdraw as Counsel Jor Petitioner Mateo Pinkston. GRANTED Mark A. Denney, Jr., Esquire and John S. Taylor, Esquire, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Wilmington, Delaware. Patrick J. Collins, Esquire, COLLINS & ASSOCIATES, Wilmington, Delaware. BUTLER, J. This matter was tried to a jury in 2017 and resulted in convictions of the defendant on charges of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API