Legal Opinion

Palladino v. Sargent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (William R. Roy, J.), entered February 4, 2003 in a legal malpractice action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the cross motion of defendants Richard H. Sargent, Esq., Tamara M. Gilmore, Esq., and Sargent, Levin, Cramer & Meyers, LLP to dismiss the action against them and granted *1083plaintiff’s “cross/cross motion” for leave to amend the ad damnum clause of the summons with notice, nunc pro tunc.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Dobkin v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Harkness v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Matsuo v. MatsuoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. L & L Developers of Greater Rochester, Inc. v. NYNA Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API