Legal Opinion

People v. Jiminez

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 1956No. Crim. 3240PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the People from an order dismissing informations against Raymond Jiminez who had been charged with possession of marijuana, and Tony Galvan and John R. Balazs who had been charged with transportation thereof. The dismissals were granted by the trial court on the basis that search for and seizure of the indispensable evidence, which was marijuana, was unlawful. When the officers found the first quantity of marijuana in an automobile in which defendants had been, they were looking, not for narcotics, but for weapons. Consideration of the evidence, then, falls into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. BlodgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. State v. SchlosserUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. HooverOregon Supreme Court · 1959

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API