Legal Opinion

Nicholson & Co. v. Whaley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 27, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mortgage foreclosure. Amendment. Before Judge ■ Pish. Webster superior court. October term, 1891. Claims were interposed by Ada Wbaley to the levy of executions in favor of Nicholson & Co. against Harris.

Read the full summary

Mortgage foreclosure. Amendment. Before Judge ■ Pish. Webster superior court. October term, 1891. Claims were interposed by Ada Wbaley to the levy of executions in favor of Nicholson & Co. against Harris. By consent the cases were tried together, and on motion of the claimant the: levy was dismissed, because the mortgages from which the executions issued by foreclosure showed upon their face that they were given to pai’ties other than Nicholson & Co., who foreclosed them, and could not be foreclosed in the name of Nicholson & Co., without written assignment of the party or parties to whom…

1Opinion of the Court

*257 Judgment reversed,.

J. B. Hudson and Port & Watson, for plaintiffs. W. H. Kimbrough, E. A. Hawkins and Butt & Lump-kin, contra.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ragan v. Coley & BrotherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Burgwyn Bros. Tobacco Co. v. Bentley & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Kunz v. CusterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API