Legal Opinion

Fox v. City of Cumming

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 23, 2009No. A09A0532PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlKELL, Judge.

This is the second appearance of this case before this Court. In Fox v. City of Cumming {“Fox 7”) 1 we held that the newly-enacted Landowner’s Bill of Rights and Private Property Protection Act, OCGA § 22-1-11, applied to pending condemnation proceedings only. Thus, because the City of Cumming had not instituted condemnation proceedings when Deborah Fox filed suit under the statute to challenge the City’s assertion of its power of eminent domain to survey her property, we affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of Fox’s action against the City. 2 After receiving the remittitur, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haggard v. Board of Regents of University SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. Bankhead v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Campbell v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. Ellis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. Department of Transportation v. WoodsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fulton County v. LordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Kitchens v. EzellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Gibson Construction Co. v. GAA Acquisitions I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Shiv Aban, Inc. v. Georgia Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  5. Gibson Law Firm, LLC v. Miller Built Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API