Legal Opinion
People v. Johnson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 10, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*522The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that his conviction of attempted grand larceny in the second degree under the first count of the indictment was based on legally insufficient evidence, because his motion for a trial order of dismissal failed to refer to any specific deficiency in the evidence presented by the People (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Prentice, 199 AD2d 343; see also, People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858, 859). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. BynumNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. SummervilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. KearseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. AbudurrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. DardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. GarbaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998