Constantine v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1012This court’s power of review under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is “ ‘extraordinary’ and will be exercised only in ‘the most exceptional circumstances.’ ” Mc-Guinness v. Commonwealth, 420 Mass. 495, 497 (1995), quoting Planned Parenthood League of Mass., Inc. v. Operation Rescue, 406 Mass. 701, 706 (1990). Relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, may not be sought “merely as a substitute for normal appellate review.” McGuinness v. Commonwealth, supra, quoting Francis v. District Attorney for the Plymouth Dist., 388 Mass. 1009, 1010 (1983). Among other things, “[pjarties seeking review must demonstrate that they…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Operation RescueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- McGuinness v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Zullo v. GoguenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ChristianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Francis v. District AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- David v. HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Burnham v. Commonwealth (No. 1)Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020
- Dowd v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Huang v. Essex Division of the Probate & Family Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003