Legal Opinion

People v. Ryer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

*908The defendant’s contention that he was denied a fair trial by certain remarks and questions posed by the trial court to various witnesses is without merit. None of the court’s questions or remarks prevented the jury from arriving at an impartial verdict based upon the evidence presented. The court kept the proceedings within the confines of the issues and encouraged clarity in the development of proof (see People v Moulton, 43 NY2d 944, 946 [1978]; People v De Jesus, 42 NY2d 519, 523 [1977]). Although certain of the court’s comments during the course of the proceedings would have been better…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. MoultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. De JesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. SmallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API