Legal Opinion · Dissent

Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Rabinowitz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 21, 1935Published

1DissentLydon, J.

I agree that the final order must be reversed, but I dissent from so much of the determination about to be made as directs a new trial.

The ground assigned for reversal in the prevailing opinion is that a jury trial was erroneously ordered. I find it unnecessary to decide the question whether, on general principles, the erroneous direction of a jury trial in a court of law is prejudicial to the opposing party. The right to a jury trial is ordinarily considered a privilege and its denial, in a case where a party is entitled to it, is always prejudicial error. It does not follow that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beakes v. . DacunhaNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Barden v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API